This week TheBigDon and Billcee are back with their "first" show to talk about everything gaming
Download here
We hope you had all had a Merry Xmas and have a happy new year.
We know the sound levels are a bit off but we are working to solve this (we are still learning).
TheBigDon and Billcee chat PC and console and maybe get a bit grumpy about it.
billcee in going to have to agree with u about the whole sequal scenario. u cant really have a sequal unless it has a new engine, if you are just going to change the story then surely that could just be a downloadable add on rather than a whole new game ? although the reason is all about money, for example the fifa games. over the years there have been certain times wen the game has not changed much, for example 2009 to 2010 wasnt a vast improvement, but it is all about money through sales. there is no way they are just going to make a patch for the game as this would lose millions of pounds in revenue. Ubisoft arent just going to turn around and say actually we'll make a downloadable patch instead of releasing a new game are they! of course they want to realease as many titles as they can such as assasains cread 2,3,4,5,6 etc, cos the developers know that people are goin to buy the games therefore profit margins are going to be allot higher than if they just made downloadable patches. :) hope that makes sense .... lol
ReplyDeleteagreed but instead of calling it Bio-shock 2. Call it Bio-shock - Little sisters adventures or something. Then in a couple of years time when you got a new or enhanced engine, more developed story, then call it Bio-shock 2. Examples of this are games like Half-life 2, Quake 2, AVP 2, new engine or not the jump was considerable. Either way Bio-shock 2 is an amazing game :D
ReplyDelete